Policies Influencing NTFP Management
and Trade
In India, where it is believed that nearly
30 million persons are dependent on NTFPs for their livelihoods
- partly or fully, there are numerous laws that try to control
the rights, access and trade of the same forest produces.
Most states have legislations controlling collection and trade
of forest producers as forest is in the concurrent list. Further
more these legislations have resulted in implementation that
differs from state to state. This is clearly discernible in
the central east Indian states of Orissa, Chhatisgarh, Jharkhand
and AP. In this context, West Bengal is a bit of an exception,
as it does not have a separate legislation controlling the
rights, access, and trade of NTFPs.
Definition
Since the state does not have any separate
legislation, obviously it has not defined the term MFP or
NTFP. But the Indian forest Act, 1927 being the guiding act
of all such acts in the states, West Bengal accepts the definition
of forest produces as defined in the central act.
NTFP Lease and Licensing Policy
As mentioned there is no guiding legislation
for the collection and trading rights of NTFPs in the state.
The trade of Kendu Leaf and Sal seed is governed by executive
orders and the rest of the NTFPs are governed by JFM guidelines
where there is a section on usufructuary rights. Even here
there is no mention of the term NTFP or MFP.
The monopoly rights of collection and disposal
of Kendu leaf and Sal seeds has been granted to WBTDCC, on
behalf of LAMPS, by the forest department as the FD is considered
the owner of forests. WBTDCC carries out the functions through
LAMPS. This monopoly rights have been given since 1978 so
that fair price can be paid to the primary collectors. And
it is for this reason that the collection is done through
the co-operative societies. This monopoly rights is handed
over through executive orders. After initial yearly renewals
of the monopoly rights by the forest department, it was renewed
every 5 years from 1982-83 season. The last renewal is due
to expire in March 2003. Though there has been no order yet,
it is learnt that this time the renewal will be for a year
i.e. only for the 2003-04 season.
The forest department takes royalty for giving
the monopoly rights. For the last 5 years the rates of royalty
was - Rs. 7.5 lakhs per annum up from Rs. 5 lakhs per annum
for the previous 5 years. Similarly the royalty for Sal seeds
was fixed at Rs. 150 / MT up from Rs. 100 / MT in the previous
5 years. One fourth of the royalty is deposited with the forest
department in advance.
As regards other produces, the relevant portions
of usufructuary rights from the JFM guidelines are given in
the following paragraphs. It is to be noted that the state
has 4 JFM guidelines as per different ecological zones where
the rotation and harvesting of crops is bound to vary.
South West Bengal
-
The members shall be
entitled to collect following items free of royalty without
causing any damage to forests/ plantations:
Fallen twigs, grass, fruits, flowers, seeds (excluding
cashew) etc. and leaves;
This will not in any manner, extinguish the rights and
privileges already granted to the members of the scheduled
tribes by the state government in their order no./ 2001
- for dated 20.4.81 and/or may be granted in future.
-
Entire Sal seeds, and
Kendu leaves so collected shall have to be deposited with
the WBTDCC through the LAMPS and LAMPS will pay the members,
in approved tariff against their individual collection.
-
The concerned forest
official shall set apart 25% of the net sale proceeds
at every final harvesting of the concerned plantation/
forests (i.e. timber, pole, etc.) and shall pay to all
eligible members or their nominee their proportionate
share out of the said earmarked funds…
North Bengal and Darjeeling Gorkha
Hill Areas
- The members shall be entitled to collect
following items free of royalty without causing any damage
to forests/ plantations:
Fallen twigs, grass, fruits, flowers,
mushrooms, seeds, leaves and intercrops raised by FPCs,
subject to any restrictions imposed from time to time,
provided however such collection will not be allowed in
National Park, core area of Tiger Reserve, and sanctum
sanctorum of sanctuary.
Medicinal plants in North Bengal will
be permitted to be collected by the FPC members free strictly
on the basis of approved micro-plans, except in National
Park, core area of Tiger Reserve, and sanctum sanctorum
of sanctuary.
Timber would not be subject to revenue
sharing. However, lops and tops derived out of clear felling
as per approved working plan which comes under a category
of firewood would be shared on 25% net sale basis.
- Entire Sal seeds, and Kendu leaves so
collected shall have to be deposited with the WBTDCC through
the LAMPS (where LAMPS are functioning) and LAMPS will pay
the members, in approved tariff against their individual
collection.
- The usufruct sharing will be subject to
restrictions imposed from time to time on account of silvicultural
and management requirements and from preservation of wild
life point of view.
Sunderbans
-
The members shall be
entitled to collect following items free of royalty without
causing any damage to forests/ plantations:
Fallen twigs, grass, fruits, flowers, seeds (excluding cashew)
etc. and leaves;
This will not in any manner, extinguish the rights and privileges
already granted to the members of the scheduled tribes by
the state government in their order no./ 2001 - for dated
20.4.81 and/or may be granted in future.
- Entire collection of honey and bee-wax
from forest plantation shall have to be deposited with the
forest department through the local range officer or his
authorised representative who will pay the members, in approved
tariff, against their individual collection.
Wild life protected areas
-
100% share of firewood
(…), thatch/ amlisho/ other grass (obtained from
firelines and fire prone zones) specified non-edible fruits,
pods, flowers, seeds, decorative fungus and leaves.
-
The members of the
EDC will have to protect and manage the protected area
to the satisfaction of the forest officer for a minimum
period of one year to become eligible for 25% share of
government receipts on account of tourist and transport
entry and photography and other such related activities
in the protected area.
From the above relevant portions of the usufructuary
rights of JFM guidelines it is implied that JFM committee
members can collect NTFPs from the region that they are protecting
without paying any royalty. The above also implies that the
produces that are important in a particular ecological region
find mention in the guidelines. For example, medicinal plants
that are an important produce in the North have been allowed
for royalty free collection by the FPC members. This however
does not mean that this will be charged in other areas. It
is just that according to the forest department, Medicinal
Plants are not found in any significant quantity in other
areas.
The above does not imply that important NTFPs in an ecological
region will be allowed to be collected in a similar manner.
This becomes clear in the guidelines for Sunderbans. Here
the most important NTFP, honey even if collected without payment
of royalty by the FPC members will have to be sold to the
forest department only. The logic here is that in absence
of forest department, the middlemen will exploit procurers
of honey.
So it is clear that the primary collectors
of the NTFPs do not have to pay royalty for collection from
the forest that they are protecting. But once the produce
is sold to the trader, the trader needs a transit pass for
taking the forest produces outside the region. And for this
he has to pay a fees to the representative of the forest department.
The department has 'Schedule of Rates for Forest Produces'
that mentions rates of all commercially important forest produces
including NTFPs in a region that has to be paid for trading
purposes. This essentially means that the royalty free collection
is allowed for self-consumption to the FPC members. However,
if the collection is made for trading, it is the trader who
pays the royalty instead of the primary collector.
The rates are published circle wise, which
implies that fixing of rates have been decentralised and also
recognises differences in availability in different ecological
regions. The rates fixation is further decentralised to the
DFOs in case of produces that do not find mention in the list
and in case of special occasions. The relevant portion has
been attached as annexure # 2.
There is one more mention in the guidelines
that merits attention - special rights of the tribals. This
is equivalent to Nistaar in other states, which provides for
certain periodical quota of forest produces (primarily poles
and fuel wood) to the tribal communities. |