| Institutions dealing
with NTFP |
|
|
| 1. GCC |
|
Girijan Co-operative Corporation is an AP government undertaking
established in 1956 for socio-economic upliftment of tribals
in the state. The structure of GCC is two tier one with it
being a federation of its member co-operatives known as Girijan
Primary Co-operative Marketing Societies (GPCMS). GCC and
GPCMS are registered under AP Cooperative Societies Act, 1964.
The bylaws of GCC mention that it is expected "to act
as agent for the Government for procurement, supply and distribution
of agricultural and other produce or other goods as and when
required to do so". The objectives of the organisation
are -
-
To ensure payment of
remunerative prices for the NTFP collected by the tribals
by eliminating middlemen and private traders who were
indulging in unfair trade practices.
-
To ensure availability
of essential commodities even in the interior agency areas
through a network of DR (Domestic Requirements) depots.
-
To provide support to
the tribals in agricultural activities through extending
credit facilities.
GCC is governed by a board of management consisting
of Chairman and officials and non-official directors appointed
by the state government. A Managing Director, an IAS officer
who also acts as the Vice Chairman of the board, administers
the affairs of the corporation. The corporation works in close
co-ordination with 10 ITDAs and the project officers of the
ITDAs act as Executive Directors of GCC in the area of their
operations. The organisation is headquartered at Visakhapatnam.
The organisation to fulfil its objectives
procures and sells NTFP and SAPs, supplies daily requirements,
and provides credit. The credit is provided by obtaining refinance
from NABARD and also through its own sources and functioning
as a District Co-operative Bank. GPCMS acts as Mandal level
stockist and transport contractor for AP Civil Supplies Corporation.
The concessions granted to the corporation for achieving its
objectives and ensuring its smooth operations are -
-
The government waived
forest rentals for the initial years
-
The government provides
staff subsidy
-
Government has waived
commercial taxes for the products handled by the corporation.
-
GCC does not pay security
deposits unlike other forest contractors
-
Officers of the corporation
are empowered to stop, detain, and examine at any place,
any vehicle and seize stocks not covered by valid transport
permit and to make further legal proceedings against the
offenders.
-
Under the AP forest
produce transit rules, the government regulated movement
of forest produce in the states through specified forest
permits and the branch managers of GCC are empowered to
issue the permits.
The GPCMSs used to be the branches of GCC,
but were later converted into primary cooperatives. The GCC
Divisional Managers were made Chairpersons of the GPCMSs in
their division. The 18-member GCC Board of Directors is expected,
according to the bylaws, to have only 5 elected Directors.
The union government nominates two Directors, and the state
government nominates the rest (11), including the Chairperson,
Vice-Chairperson and Managing Director. The state government
has the right, as specified in the bylaws, to veto any resolution
of the general body or the board, until such time as the government
share in equity is fully redeemed by the GCC. 1835 staffs
are employed in the corporation that has a network of 1 regional
office, 9 divisional offices, 45 GPCMS and 839 DR depots.
Salaries in the structure used to be paid for by state government
till recently, and now, a part is borne by GCC.
The membership for GPCMS is open only to
people from local tribal communities. As mentioned in the
previous chapters, GCC has monopoly right to procure and trade
in certain forest produces. The produces procured are then
sold as such or after value addition through auctions and/or
tenders. Now, GCC is asking for advance tenders for buying
of forest produces it intends to buy. This helps it in knowing
the demand in the market and GCC accordingly fixes its procurement
targets. This also helps in fixing the prices of NTFP thereby
reducing the risk element in GCC's operations.
Procurement of NTFP is traditionally carried
out in weekly shandies in the tribal areas. GCC identifies
centrally located tribal villages and opens purchase centres.
The DR centres also operate as purchase centres for NTFP.
The procurement operations are carried out through the field
level network e.g. Credit cum Purchase Assistant and Salesman
of DR depots under the supervision of Branch/ Divisional Managers.
Spot payment is made for the produce purchased from tribals.
Since the DR depots at the same time sales daily requirements,
goods can be exchanged for cash equivalent of forest produces
sold.
GCC markets produce with value additions
where possible and also under takes research and development
activities to improve the quality / quantity of the product.
The procurement being huge in terms of quantity are stored
in the GCC or government godowns and sold whenever it gets
the right price. This itself is a value addition and GCC has
been successful in preventing the distress sale of the forest
produces by the primary gatherers.
Pricing being a key factor in the procurement, GCC makes provisions
to publicise its prices fixed. This also ensures no underpayment
by the agency functionaries. The prices are announced through
Radio programmes, Tom - tom/ megaphones in all major shandies,
and pamphlets distributed and pasted in depots. The ITDA network
also is used for the purpose.
GCC's NTFP turnover has been given in the
following figures. From its beginning in 1956-57, the turnover
has gone up to Rs. 20 crores in 2000-01. Though this does
not look a big figure, the growth is high given the constraints
under which it operates and looking at its counterparts in
other states. The procurement was rather very low till the
late 60s. Between 1978-79 and 1988-89, procurement figures
grew by nearly 2 times. Similarly between 1988-89 and 2000-01,
NTFP turnover has grown by nearly 4 times. However the procurement
has taken a sharp dip in 2001-02. The total procurement was
Rs. 156 crores against Rs. 249 crores in the previous year.
2000-01 incidentally is the only year in the recent past when
sales have dropped below procurement. Is this the reason for
lower procurement the next year given that the government
support is reducing? This also indicates that GCC has been
incurring cash profits in NTFP if one does not take into account
the institutional expenses.
Figure
: GCC NTFP Turnover (In Rs. Lakhs)
Figure
: GCC NTFP Turnover (In Rs. Lakhs)
Information about overall business of GCC
over the past few years is provided in the following table.
The figures clearly indicate that procurement of NTFP is not
the first priority of GCC. It is the supply of consumption
items or daily requirements that occupies prime space in GCC's
turnover. The growth rate of DR sales has in fact been higher
then the growth of procurement. Supply of agricultural inputs
and credit disbursement is a miniscule part of its turnover
and has decreased over the years.
|
Table: Turnover of GCC
(In millions of rupees)
| |
89-90 |
90-91 |
91-92 |
92-93 |
93-94 |
94-95 |
95-96 |
96-97 |
97-98 |
98-99 |
99-00 |
00-01 |
01-02 |
| Procurement (NTFP & SAP) |
124 |
166 |
188 |
128 |
127 |
103 |
129 |
123 |
141 |
149 |
230 |
249 |
156 |
| Sales |
124 |
159 |
189 |
131 |
167 |
112 |
148 |
146 |
170 |
198 |
285 |
231 |
192 |
| Supply of consumption items |
304 |
360 |
404 |
429 |
468 |
477 |
412 |
482 |
550 |
613 |
610 |
760 |
713 |
| Supply of Agri. Inputs |
0 |
8 |
26 |
64 |
60 |
31 |
23 |
12 |
11 |
0 |
20 |
22 |
- |
| Credit disbursement |
- |
19 |
78 |
139 |
97 |
60 |
49 |
22 |
29 |
29 |
49 |
50 |
24 |
|
Source: GCC Annual Reports
Apart from procuring, selling and providing credit, other activities
of GCC are -
-
It has established
processing units to convert produces in raw form to consumer
goods. Prominent among them are - honey processing unit,
Sheekakai and soap nut unit, soap making unit and tamarind
packing unit. The honey produced by GCC is of premium
grade and is popular in the retail market. Where earlier,
it used to be sold only through GCC's retail outlets;
it is now available in Hyderabad in most large retail
stores.
-
The co-operative gives
training to tribals on scientific collection of NTFP to
improve the quality and realise higher sale value. Adoption
of new techniques in Gum Karaya tapping has led to increase
in quality yields and in turn payment of higher purchase
prices to tribals. The prices have increased from Rs.
30 / KG to Rs. 125/ KG in a span of 10 years.
-
GCC has taken up regeneration
of important NTFP species in the forest areas of north
coastal districts of AP through the FD. The project has
a financial outlay of Rs. 50 Lakhs.
-
GCC is now trying to
develop brand equity for its products in the name of 'GIRIJAN'
brand. The idea is to ensure that products ranging from
neem soap, turmeric soap, honey, sheekakai powder to rajma
and tamarind, get a place in the supermarkets all across
the country. Various consumer friendly packages of consumer
goods that are made from produces collected by the tribals
have been developed for the same. The marketing plank
of GCC for its products is the fact that they are all
nature-based.
-
In a bid to enlarge
its products basket, GCC has made new additions to the
NTFP procured by adding products such as medicinal herbs,
French beans (white), and white beans.
-
GCC has adopted retail
marketing of its products to reach the end consumers directly.
Most of the edible products are sold in its DR shops as
well as retail outlets. Similarly it supplies wild brooms
to the municipal corporation of Hyderabad. Apart from
selling products through chains of retails shops, it has
been trying to develop a retail chain of its own in various
districts of the state. GCC achieved a turnover of Rs.
31.6 crores under retail sale in the year 2001-02. The
organisation also supplies consumer products to welfare
hostels, jails, endowments, PSU co-operatives.
-
Another area that GCC
is planning to enter is marketing of a bio-flocculent
that could be used to extract uranium from the ore to
a maximum extent because of its high capability to bind
atomic minerals. A seed called stychnos potatorum is grown
extensively in the tribal areas in the State that has
high bio-flocculent properties. The National Metallurgical
Laboratory at Jamshedpur and Uranium Corporation of India
are presently engaged in research to extract the basic
substance from the seed, which can bind uranium. GCC has
already applied for a patent for this product, which will
be a very high-value product.
-
Apart from distributing
domestic requirements, the organisation is also distributing
LPG connections to women under poverty line through a
AP government scheme. Now under the proposal of decentralisation
it has begun to handover DR depots to SHGs. GCC also undertook
the responsibility of distributing rice for the Food for
Work undertaken in the region where it operates.
-
There have been instances
when GCC has paid bonus in case of benefits accrued in
certain commodities. In the system of commodity bonus
introduced for the first time in 1991-92, where 50% of
the profit earned by GCC in the marketing of a commodity
procured from tribals was ploughed back. This was done
in the soapnuts, maize, paddy, cotton, niger seed and
gum. However in the recent years this practice has been
discontinued.
-
In Comparison to other
neighbouring states where NTFP are available, notably
Orissa, Chhatisgarh and Maharastra, prices offered by
GCC to the primary collectors are higher. This is specially
so in Tamarind and Gum. Agreeably, GCC has developed the
best marketing network among the states. However GCC also
gets the highest amount of subsidy of all its contemporaries.
GCC has the potential to become a major player in the
nature-based products market, with the tribal areas in
Andhra Pradesh having a wealth of minor forest and agricultural
produce. Studies have shown that tribal areas in the State
have Rs 18 crore worth tamarind, 2,500 MT of French beans
worth Rs 45 crore, Rs. 20 crore worth Adda leaf and another
Rs 20 crore worth medicinal plants. But the organisation
is hardly tapping 10 % of the forest wealth at present.
2. DPIP/ SERP
Some of the ITDAs/ DPIP have been experimenting
with organising NTFP collectors into groups with a view to
provide them improved implements, training, market intelligence
and small value addition facilities. Some of such groups are
able to collect better quality produce and also able to approach
the market directly thereby realising a higher price then
would have been possible otherwise.
ITDAs/ DPIPs have proposed to increase the
scope of such groups and also to federate them at local and
bigger level into MACS so that these groups could benefit
to a greater extent by collection, storage, processing and
marketing of NTFP. In this manner the groups besides gaining
the bargaining power, will be able to specialise in optimum
handling and sustainable harvesting of NTFP.
To obviate the activities of these groups
from clashing with monopoly rights of GCC, it is proposed
to wherein GCC will allow NTFP pickers' association to deal
with their produce effectively and also pass on its monopoly
rights to the MACS formed by such associations to establish
marketing, processing and value addition facilities.
3. Others
Several VDOs, such as Samata, Sakti, Laya
and ARTIC, have organised tribal communities around their
rights to the forests, and livelihoods. They have helped them
form informal collectives/cooperatives, with ARTIC now beginning
to promote cooperatives under the new law. SHGs promoted by
NGOs and government agencies do primary processing and sell
the produces at the nearest city. Though illegal, they are
able to do it as it is on a lower scale. Food World, a big
retail chain is ready to procure from SHGs but wants assured
supply.
Some of the local NGOs such as Laya in East
Godavari and Kovel Foundation in Visakhapatnam involved in
promotion of medicinal plants have imparted training to tribals,
about medicinal plants, its uses and harvesting.
|
GCC FOR THE TRIBALS!!!Findings
of a study done on 'Role of GPCMS in Scheduled Areas
of East Godavari District' in 1997 by P. Trinadha Rao,
1997 is still relevant -
- GCC procures produces that are
profitable and are available in larger quantity
and not the ones that have restricted margins or
are available in lesser quantity.
- GCC strategy encourages farming
of cash crops and increased use of chemical fertilisers
and pesticides. This in turns makes the whole production
system very risky and gets the tribals indebted.
The credit by GCC goes towards farming of crops
like tobacco (seed), groundnut, and paddy.
- Of the total 222 villages studied,
42 villages have a GCC depot inside 1 KM, 65 within
2-3 KM, 57 within 4-5, 49 within 5- 9 KM and 9 above
10 KM.
|
|
A GPCMS at WORK (Shashi Rajagopalan,
2002)
GPCMS Gummalakshmipuram is situated
in Gummalakshmipuram Mandal of Vizianagaram district.
It was founded in 1956 as Agency Produce Marketing Cooperative
Society. It covers 2 mandals (Gummalakshmipuram and
Kurupam), 7 panchayats, and 39 villages (180 including
hamlets) all in a 40 km radius. The tribal population
in the area is around 64,000, and there are 18,000 others
in the area. Tribes in the area included Thegulu, Savara,
Kondadora, Jatapu, Gadaba and others. Their weekly income
range between Rs 100 and Rs 600, based on the season
and produce gathered.
As on 31.3.99, the GPCMS had over 22,500
members, 10% of whom were women. In 1994, the membership
had been 7270. As only one person from a family could
become a member, it appeared that the membership rolls
had either not been revised to take into account expired
members, or, persons not of tribal community, too, were
members. The 60 staff members were on deputation from
the GCC, with GCC meeting a little more than 50% of
the staff salaries. The rest came from the primary cooperative
itself. The cooperative owns a sales depot, a godown,
an office building, some staff quarters, and a jeep.
When members were asked whom the cooperative
belonged to, they said that it existed for their welfare,
but belonged to the government. Members appeared to
be on good terms with the staff, but were very respectful
of them, as they were thought of as representatives
of the government. The cooperative had not had elections
since 1980, and no member met could recall a general
body meeting being held. Members said that they would
indeed like meetings, and would like control over the
cooperative. However, they said that the cooperative
was too large. They felt that if it were confined just
to their village, they could manage it better. They
felt that the village level cooperatives could be federated,
and processing units, as for cashew, could perhaps be
at this federation, which, too, should be located within
the group of villages in the federation.
The members between November and January
each year collected myrobalan from the forest, and also
attended to crop harvesting. Between February and May,
they collected tamarind, and between May and July, pungam
and mahua. In summer, beedi leaves were collected. Procurement
by GPCMS over last two years is provided in the following
table.
|
|
| Minor forest produce |
1998-1999 |
1999-2000 |
| Quantity (qtl) |
Rupees (in 000) |
Quantity (qtl) |
Rupees (in 000) |
| Seeded tamarind |
13,864 |
9,111 |
1,999 |
1,425 |
| Hill brooms (nos.) |
2599 (no.) |
13 |
588 (no.) |
3 |
| Cleaning nuts |
3.4 |
1.3 |
0 |
0 |
| Myrabalam |
1,717 |
858 |
16 |
8 |
| Mahua seed |
1,579 |
1,500 |
796 |
796 |
| Mahua flower |
13 |
3.8 |
47 |
16 |
| Tamarind seed |
78 |
15.5 |
119 |
36 |
| Pungam seed |
156 |
55 |
153 |
69 |
| Nux vomica |
1 |
0.3 |
0 |
0 |
| RS Roots |
1 |
1.7 |
0.3 |
1.3 |
| Marking nuts |
1,065 |
310 |
384 |
115 |
| Naramamidi bark |
305 |
366 |
34 |
48 |
| Cassiotora |
2 |
0.3 |
0 |
0 |
| Tapsi gum grade I |
0.5 |
5.4 |
0 |
0 |
| Tapsi gum grade II |
7.6 |
57 |
5.4 |
48 |
| Tapsi gum grade III |
14 |
70 |
16 |
97 |
| Tippageega |
63 |
19 |
1 |
0.3 |
| Amla |
4 |
2.7 |
0 |
0 |
| TOTAL |
|
12,390 |
|
2,662.6 |
|
As may be seen from the table, and as
seen from the figures provided by the cooperative for
the past 6 years, although GPCMS procures a number of
items, its main business is in seeded tamarind, myrabalam,
mahua seed, marking nuts, and naramamidi bark, and in
grade I and II gum, and pungam seed. Agricultural produce
procured included niger seed, red gram, turmeric, ragi,
paddy, sunflower seed and cashew nut. The quantities
procured were insignificant, and procurement erratic.
Different types of produce come in at different times
of the year, and the cooperative currently probably
feels obliged to procure whatever its members bring
in. However, dealing in so many items, adds to costs
of storage, accounting, transport, and staff, without
bringing in additional income of value to members.
The GCC divisional office provided
the following figures on the potential for collection
of some of the produce in the area.
| Minor forest produce |
Procurement Potential (in
Qtl.) from Gumma-lakshmipuram area |
Maximum procured in a year
as % of potential during 1998-2000 |
| Seeded tamarind |
35,000 |
39.6 % |
| Hill brooms (nos.) |
5000 |
52 % |
| Cleaning nuts |
500 |
0.7 % |
| Myrabalam |
1500 |
114.5 % |
| Mahua seed |
1550 |
101.9 % |
| Mahua flower |
200 |
23.5 % |
| Tamarind seed |
300 |
39.7 % |
| Pungam seed |
400 |
39 % |
| Nux vomica |
300 |
0.3 % |
| Gum |
45 |
49.1 % |
| Marking nuts |
1200 |
88.8 % |
| Cassiotora |
400 |
0.5 % |
| Amla |
200 |
2 % |
The variation between the potential
and the actual procurement, and the procurement from
year to year depend on a variety of factors such as
working capital availability, storage capacity available,
rates in the open market, yield.
In Iridi, one of the villages covered
by the cooperative, members said that 8-9 years ago,
cashew was introduced in the area, and since the last
4-5 years, they were selling the cashew crop. The village
had 30 acres under cashew. Within a 10 km radius, they
estimated that there were at least 200 acres of the
crop. From each acre, 3-4 quintals of cashew was expected.
In early years they had some problems, as the local
police and forest officials said that cashew was a minor
forest produce, and it was not for them to dispose of
it as they wished to. They said that each family harvested
its own crop, and then informed the village head of
the quantity available for sale. Based on total quantities
available, one from among the village leaders, negotiated
with traders for the sale of the entire village cashew
produce. This was not formally a part of the cooperative's
programme, though the village itself did act in a cooperative
manner when dealing with cashew. The cooperative's staff
said that cashew export was the main industry at Palasa,
which was en route to the district headquarters at Vizianagaram.
Most produce was taken by women as
head loads, and by men on their shoulders, to the local
weekly shandy. The weekly shandy exhibited brisk business,
with people from tribal communities bringing in vegetables,
and small businesswomen and men buying it off them,
for sale in small urban centres. So, too, the shandy
was a place where simple clothes, and other consumer
goods were on display, for sale to the local community.
The cooperative receives interest free
working capital of Rs 3 to 4 million rupees each year,
provided to it from the GCC. As with cashew, the cooperative
does not process or sell any of the minor forest produce
that it collects. Different products are taken to processing
units owned or hired by GCC located at different places.
|
|
|